Artificial Scarcity, AI, and the Future of Legal Education: Lessons from Nyay and EduCulture

In 2013, with two very young children I asked my spiritual mentor if he had any parenting advise. He smiled, “Samirji, the biggest challenge of your generation is providing artificial scarcity to your children.” I did not fully get him then, but over the years this has proven to be the best parenting tip.

Every previous generation had scarcity built into the world for free. Information was hard to get, attention had to be earned through effort. A child who wanted an answer had to go to a library, ask an elder, or sit with the discomfort of not knowing for a while. Today’s children inherited a world where every answer, every distraction, every shortcut is just one tap away. If we want our children to develop a mind capable of depth, we have to manufacture the very friction that used to come built into life itself.

My sons are going to be 15 and 17 soon, and neither of them have owned a mobile phone as yet, but both are deeply respected by their friends and teachers for the depth of their understanding and the maturity they bring to a conversation. They use AI to explore new concepts, and parents’ phones for calls and to look at social media, and do both with a level of awareness that came directly from years of artificially engineered scarcity before any of these tools entered their hands.

Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre announced on June 19, 2026 that hashtagGenerativeAI tools would be barred from classrooms for children aged 6 to 13, citing the risk of hashtagCognitiveOffloading, where children outsource effortful thinking to a tool rather than building the capacity themselves. The scientific principle behind this concern is called Desirable Difficulty, the finding that learning tasks requiring real effort produce far stronger long-term retention than tasks that feel easy in the moment. One of history’s most rigorous developed economies just legislated, by force of law, a principle my mentor handed me over a decade ago in a single sentence!

This is precisely the territory of hashtagNyay. The word carries two meanings in our tradition, and both are relevant here. Nyay is one of the six classical schools of hashtagIndianPhilosophy, built entirely around the discipline of rigorous hashtagLogicalReasoning, of refusing an easy conclusion until it has been tested, argued, and earned. Nyay is also the everyday word for hashtagJustice. The ancient guru-shishya tradition operated on exactly the desirable difficulty Norway has now written into policy. A shishya wrestled with a question under a guru’s relentless questioning rather than being handed the answer, because the wrestling itself was the curriculum.

hashtagEduCulture‘s argument is simply that we do not need to wait for Norway’s parliament to tell us what our own civilisational pedagogy already knew. We need parents, teachers, and policymakers willing to provide their children the artificial scarcity the modern world no longer provides for free. Question of AI era is how should our hashtagLegalEducation handle hashtagDesiredDifficulty?

Beyond Skills: Giving Teenagers a Compass for the Future

Think about the hashtag#teenager in your home or near you. Smart, capable, digitally fluent, and at the same time also overwhelmed in ways they cannot name. We live in a hashtag#VUCA world (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous). hashtag#AI has turbocharged these as it rewrites entire industries between one school year and the next. A young person today will navigate careers, relationships, and ethical choices that no previous generation has a map for. And into this storm, we are sending them armed with information and skills, but almost no internal compass.

Every civilisation that lasted long enough to be worth studying understood that hashtag#puberty is the precise moment to hand a young person that compass. The Jewish Bar Mitzvah assigns a 13-year-old with an important responsibility. From this day, you are answerable for your own actions. Similarly, the Aboriginal Walkabout sends a boy into the wilderness alone for months, to deepen his connection to identity and belonging before he returns as a man. Japan’s Seijin Shiki gathers every young person who has turned 20 and says collectively: you belong to this society now. You owe it something.

Indian Culture had its own answer, the hashtag#Janeu or hashtag#Upanayan sanskar just before hitting puberty. Upanayan means bringing near, bringing a young person into proximity with dharm, with their own deeper nature. The child receives the sacred thread, taught the Gayatri mantr, and is formally initiated into student life under a guru. In South India, the Ritu Kala Samskaram marks the same threshold for girls. These are civilisational frameworks designed at exactly the moment a young person most needs one. There is nothing stopping us from removing any caste, religion and gender barrier from this sanskar, is there? Who will say no for this to their child? Gargi underwent it. Maitreyi underwent it.

At the heart of the Upanayana is hashtag#Vivek, the faculty of discernment, the ability to distinguish hashtag#dharm from adharm, right action from merely convenient action. A young person with Vivek does not get overwhelmed by VUCA. They read it, they develop appropriate frameworks and become capable of seeing around corners, prepare for what may be coming, and make their moves with steadiness and purpose. That is a very different thing from anxiety, from reactivity, from the paralysis that so many young people carry today without even knowing why.

Most Indian families still perform the Upanayan, but the gap between ritual and meaning is the gap an entire generation is falling through.

hashtag#EduCulture proposes to close it. A young person shaped by their civilisational inheritance does not need to be told how to behave in a VUCA world. They already carry the framework. They know what changes and what stays constant. They can take advantage of what is coming without losing their sense of what is right.

When did we decide that producing skilled people was enough, and stopped asking whether we were producing good ones?